Pricing on these cores is simply amazing, with a top-end Epyc 7742 selling for just $6950, or roughly $108 per core. What that means is when HPE, Dell, Lenovo, Supermicro, etc. The addition of 256-bit AVX2 registers to the Ryzen design means that AMD CPUs now offer up to 4x the floating-point performance of Epyc 1. Just as Ryzen will shortly reach up to 16 cores on desktop, Epyc will now field up to 64 cores. Q2/2020: Release date: Q2/2019: show more data: show more data: Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. In terms of price/performance, it’s not even close.Andy Patrizio is a freelance journalist based in southern California who has covered the computer industry for 20 years and has built every x86 PC he’s ever owned, laptops not included.There are other advantages to the AMD processor, as well: support for up to 4TB per socket vs. Xeon’s 1.5TB per socket, and PCI Express 4 for AMD vs. PCI Express 3 for Intel, which is half the speed of PCIe 4.
Q1/2020: show more data: show more data: Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. As we know Intel dominated all these years because they were simply better. Intel Core i9-9900 vs AMD Epyc 7702: 25. Unless you use Cascade Lake-AP, you’re limited to 28 cores in an Intel socket. Dell, Lenovo, and HPE have servers in the works. This is why Intel CEO Bob Swan started acknowledging that his company expects a more competitive AMD several months ago. Now to bring in the customers.So, the two-socket AMD system outperforms the four-socket Intel system by up to 3.74% in single-core workloads and 24.83% in multi-core workloads. Intel’s dual sockets top out at 56 cores, AMD can do a single-socket 64-core system.Single-threaded workloads have an average improved IPC of 1.15x at the same frequency, while 32-core / 64-thread workload uplift is even higher, at 1.23x. Again, we see AMD putting in particular effort to make certain its top-end parts are difficult or impossible for Intel to match. start shipping their servers, they will tune and optimize the daylights out of them vs. the AMD reference box and get even better performance.Andy Patrizio is a freelance technology writer based in Orange County, California. A 2S AMD Rome deployment packs up to 128 cores. It’s purely a performance measure and looks only to see how fast a processor can go. AMD can sell you 64.Some of these gains will be familiar to those who have followed AMD’s 7nm Ryzen unveils. The Cascade Lake-AP servers that Intel sells are BGA-only and by all accounts, exceptionally expensive. The maximum gain AMD saw from IPC and efficiency improvements on a 32-core CPU was up to 1.4x, though this should be considered an unusual result. Ice Lake servers will not arrive for another year. Each Epyc 7742 costs $6,950, while each Xeon Platinum 8180M goes for $13,011. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. It does not use real-world apps the way PCMark uses spreadsheets and graphics apps to test application performance.And ServeTheHome used an AMD reference server for the Epyc tests, while it used a Dell PowerEdge R840 for the Xeons. Analysts are predicting the company’s market share in servers could double by mid-2020. And it costs one quarter the price. AMD also supports up to 4TB of RAM per socket. AMD Epyc 7702 vs Intel Core i5-6200U : 24.