We’re also looking at virtually no difference between the DDR4-2666 and 3200 configurations.It also means while the Ryzen 5 3600 is 8% faster than the 10400 when using the same speed memory, when forcing the 10400 to run at the 2666 spec on B or H-series boards the 3600 is a whopping 19% faster in the Puget Systems Photoshop benchmark.Jumping up to 1440p reduces the margins for the most part and the 10400 performs roughly the same using either DDR4-2666 or 3200 memory.Moving to 1440p sees the margins remain much the same and it would be impossible to tell the difference between the 10400 and 3600, even when using slower DDR4-2666 memory.Since this is a locked part, we'll include a DDR4-2666 memory configuration as that is the maximum memory speed you’ll get access to B and H-series motherboards.The Ryzen processors were tested on the Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master, 8th and 9th-gen Core processors were tested on the Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra and the new 10th-gen Intel processors on the Asus ROG Maximus XII Extreme. Here it was 11% faster than the Core i5-10400 and 20% faster when comparing the Intel processor with DDR4-2666 memory. Granted a 5% increase is pretty small for a 20% boost in memory frequency, but still that’s more that what we saw in Cinebench. HP 14 14" Micro-Edge Laptop Computer, AMD Ryzen 3 3200U up to 3.5GHz (Beats i5-7200U), 4GB DDR4 RAM, 128GB SSD, 802.11AC WiFi, Bluetooth 4.2, Windows 10, iPuzzle Mouse Pad $379.00 Accéder à …
With that said, we’ve picked key application and game benchmarks to look at, so here we go.Shadow of the Tomb Raider is probably the most CPU demanding title we test with, it’s certainly right up there with Battlefield V. So it’s interesting to not only see a big difference between the DDR4 memory configurations, but to also see the Ryzen 5 3600 trailing the Core i5-10400 by a 4% margin and beating it when using DDR4-2666.We've had access to several new Z490 boards and only Asus seems to adhere to these limits with MSI, Asrock and Gigabyte all running without power limits with only one or two exceptions on mATX and Mini-ITX boards. Using DDR4-2666 sees the 10400 slip a little behind but just barely.When looking at power consumption we find that while the Ryzen 5 3600 isn’t miles better than the 10400, it does consume roughly the same amount of power for around 10% better performance.As you just witnessed, when it comes to gaming performance the Core i5 processor is roughly on par with the 3600, while for productivity tasks AMD's offering is often up to 10% faster while consuming a similar level of power. It’s important to note that worst case the Intel CPU was still spitting out over 180 fps at all times in our test, so how much that 20% margin matters here is debatable.Moving over to 7-zip and here we’re looking at a 5% performance boost for the 10400 when using the faster spec memory.
In fact, the 10400 was slower than even the 1600 AF.Cinebench R20 multi-core goes first and right off the bat we see that memory speed doesn’t impact these rendering workloads as the Core i5-10400 produces basically the same result using either DDR4-3200 or 2666 memory.We see a rather significant difference in Shadow of the Tomb Raider performance when comparing DDR4-3200 and 2666. Moreover, the 2666 configuration is now just 3% slower when comparing the average frame rate.Battlefield V shows the Core i5-10400 performing very well in games, and with the same-spec memory it roughly matches the Core i7-8700K, making it around 5% faster than the 3600 when comparing the average frame rate. That being the case, the typical out of the both experience won't be power limited and therefore we'll be testing the Core i5-10400 on a Z490 board with no TDP restrictions in place.
Quelle est la différence entre AMD Ryzen 3 3200G et Intel Core i5-7500? However, when paired with a B or H-series board, the 10400 will match the 3600 in this title.The margin widens when it comes to decompression performance and here the 10400 was at least 22% slower than the 3600. AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs. Intel Core i5-7500 - Résultats des tests de performances de Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark et Geekbench 3 When comparing the DDR4-3200 configurations the Ryzen 5 3600 was still 8% faster, not a massive margin but for a CPU that generally costs less, that’s a good result for AMD.Moreover, when jumping up to 1440p which we feel is a more realistic scenario with an RTX 2080 Ti, the 10400 and 3600 are indistinguishable in terms of gaming experience.