For example, this is the first time in the recent technology timeline that AMD surpassed Intel in IPC (Instructions per clock). It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.The overall result is as we surmised. Since then, there have been a lot of debates on the Matisse chips, especially if you take into account the boost clocks. The 3700X pulls ahead in the majority of metrics thanks to its 8 extra threads that the i7 9700K is just crippled without and cannot make up the advantage through better core to core latency or higher clock speed. Sure, they’re not as fast as Intel’s offerings, but the advantages outweigh the negatives by a long shot, so it’s a clear win for team red. 4.9GHz vs 4.4GHz To drive my point home, have a look at the non-gaming workloads.All the benchmarks were conducted at 1080p using the highest in-game preset.When AMD’s Ryzen 3000 processors first landed, we published the review of the Ryzen 7 3700X which performed on par with the much more expensive Core i9-9900K in most non-gaming workloads while being a notch slower in gaming. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.The overall result is as we surmised. Cheers!As Intel puts it, these are all real-world tests from applications that are used in everyday computing such as compressing, browsing, encoding, streaming, etc:Yeah, thanks. The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU.
I didn't like the ones...Moving on, we decided to do the CPU focused benchmark in case of Ashes and found out that when the game is CPU bound, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X comes out on top and that too by a notable margin. The Ryzen 7 3700X is AMD’s answer to the Intel Core i7-9700k, which has ruled the under-$400 CPU space.. Well, when compared to the i7 9700K, the new processor provides a 2% increase in single core speeds due to the increased boost clock / overclocking ceiling and a whopping 25% increase in multi core productivity applications due to the processor having 8 additional threads above the 9700K.Intel has also improved the integrated memory controller to now support up to 128 GB of dual-channel DDR4 memory. For most users this is meaningless, but if you plan on building a future-proof machine that will last the next seven years or so, you never know when you’ll need more than 64 GB of RAM.AMD’s 3rd generation Ryzen 7 3700X processor uses the Zen 2 micro architecture. These titles have shown better CPU utilization than the average AAA game, making them ideal for this benchmark.This is already evident from the fact that in games leveraging DX12, the deltas between the two chips is either minimal or the 3700X is faster. The Intel Core i7-9700K is slightly faster in gaming workloads, but the … These cookies do not store any personal information.Yep.. Since then, there have been a lot of debates on the Matisse chips, especially if you take into account the boost clocks. What is the difference between AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and Intel Core i7-9700F? The Intel CPU though can slightly pull ahead during gaming and will bless users with a slightly higher average framerate when compared to the 3700X – the average difference is around 5% in favor of the 9700K.Continuing the talk about performance, we can split this category into two main parts; single core and multicore.