Marseille Weather April,
Esports And Sports Marketing,
Mael Pronunciation Irish,
Fairchild Radio Richmond,
Nokia 8110 Matrix,
Official Secrets Act 1989,
Snake Knot Keychain,
Deliveroo Student Discount Ireland,
Firefox Logo History,
Games Like Happy Aquarium,
Sydney Festival Bookings,
Tpwd Trout Stocking Schedule 2019 2020,
Norris Lake Mooring,
Josh Allen Hand Size,
Roma Vs Verona Prediction,
Tom Arnold House,
Accuweather Allentown, Pa,
Ryzen 7 4800hs Vs Ryzen 9 4900hs,
Kathleen Battle Married,
Ryzen 5 2600 Motherboard Bundle,
Karlie Kloss Taylor Swift Vogue,
Pete Souza Documentary,
Snapdragon 655 Vs Kirin 710,
ASM International Contact,
Twitter Wanted Down Under,
The Last Of Us 2 Jackson,
Al Khobar Corniche Tower,
The Blackout 2020 Movie,
Testing with Far Cry New Dawn at 1080p sees a frame rate boost of 12% and this was enough to put the 10600K on par with the 10700K and 10900K.Moving on to 7-zip, the 10600K again matched the 8700K in decompression performance, making it 20% slower than the 3600 and almost 40% slower than the 3700X.Next up we have the Blender Open Data benchmark where the 10600K was 5% faster than the 8700K, completing the CPU benchmark is 1282 seconds. That being the case, I can also see how buying a processor with 25% less cores for roughly the same price might not be the wisest of investments moving forward. Here we’re looking at virtually identical performance from the 3700X and 10600K, while the more expensive 10700K and 10900K are a few frames faster.When compared to Ryzen, it was 11% faster than the Ryzen 7 3700X at 1080p, which is a reasonable performance uplift. Those margins are reduced for both processors at 1440p, and then at 4K we’re GPU limited to the point where you don’t see more than a frame or two difference.Starting things off we have Warhammer: Vermintide 2 and here we see at 1080p, for maximum frame rates, the 9400F was 13% faster than the 2600X when comparing base configurations. Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600 better than Intel Core i5+8400? The Ryzen 5 2600X has 6 more threads than the Core i5-9400F 6-Core. Here the 10600K was able to match the average frame rate of the 10700K and 10900K and just marginally behind on the 1% low result.Despite increasing the resolution to 1440p we see basically the same margins, this time the 10600K was 6% faster than the 3700X and 7% faster than the 3600.The 10600K also outscores the 8700K in After Effects albeit by a marginal 3% improvement. As far as we're aware no retailer has received stock and we’ve been told there will be no stock available in Q2. In this instance the Intel CPU was just 1% faster or 1fps faster when comparing 1% low data and 4% faster when comparing the average frame rate.Red Dead Redemption 2 is another heavily GPU bound title, even with the dialed down high quality settings at 1080p. It’s possible last time there was an update running in the background that threw this data off by a small margin.Stock the Corsair H150i Pro kept the 10600K at just 52 C and here we’re looking at a package power of just 104 watts.
As a result the 10600K was just a few frames slower than the 10700K and 10900K, while it beat the 3700X by a 5% margin.What all that means is, for roughly the same price AMD is offering more cores and that will undoubtedly result in better productivity performance. This is typically how we test Intel CPUs, such as the 9900K and this is also how the majority of Z490 boards operate out of the box. That in my opinion makes it Intel’s best value high-end gaming CPU.Then we see that the manual 5.1 GHz overclock using 1.35v boosted the Cinebench score to 4039 pts, a further 5% performance bump.Finally we have Shadow of the Tomb Raider where we see a 6% boost in 1% low performance with a few extra frames on average. The Core i5-10600K shows a small performance improvement over the 8700K in the Corona Benchmark and that meant it was 7% faster than the 3600, but it's no match for the 16 threads of the 3700X, delivering over 20% more performance.DaVinci Resolve Studio 16 sees a marginal gain for the 10600K over the 8700K and again the new Core i5 processor was slower than the Ryzen 5 3600, managed only to match the R5 2600.Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege saw the 10600K deliver 276 fps on average which is comparable to the performance enabled by the 10700K and 10900K.
It's also been several patches since our testing and many have addressed performance. Perhaps more crucially, the total system usage was 21% higher than the 3700X and a whopping 32% more than the 3600, despite only beating the Ryzen 5 processor by a 4% margin in this test.The most unexpected result so far, the 10600K was 10% faster than the 8700K in Adobe Photoshop. It was slower than the Ryzen 5 3600 and quite a bit slower than the 3700X.Ghost Recon Breakpoint is a very GPU limited title, even at 1080p with the mighty RTX 2080 Ti. There is a reasonably large difference in 1% low performance though as the Core i5 was 12% slower than the 10700K.
Even at 4K the 2600X struggled to get the most out of the RTX 2080 Ti without those tweaks.Here is another example where the 9400F was faster by a small margin.
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3600X better than Intel Core i5-9400F?