Mitsubishi 7 Seater,
Jack Falahee Family,
Lake Las Vegas Boat Rentals,
Lionsgate Films Films Produced,
Eaton Vance ETF,
Kleenex Cottonelle Flushable Wipes,
Zscaler Revenue 2019,
When Skies Are Grey Everton Forum,
Lake Pleasant Fishing Report June 2020,
Dentsply Endo Motor,
Andrew Garfield And Emma Stone Baby,
406 Washington Blvd Stamford Ct,
St John's Women's Basketball Schedule,
Bella's Italian Cafe Reservations,
Josh McCown Coach,
Schneider Electric Management Trainee Program,
Ebay Invoices For Sellers,
Wdbj7 Weather Photos,
Backward Crochet Method,
Australian Survivor Season 7 Episode 2,
Snake Catcher Contact Number,
Ryan Nall 40 Time,
Appomattox Shell Wiki,
Harvest Moon: Back To Nature,
The 3500X isn’t commonly available outside of China, so this isn’t much to consider other than for intrigue. The 1600AF is close enough that there’s not any meaningful difference between the two, and the 9100F is still led by the 3100. Ryzen 5 3600 and the 3300X have traded a few shots throughout our tests, with the latter often serving up the lion's share of the 3600's performance, but at a lower price point. The R3 3100 requires 40.3 seconds per turn to process across 5 AI players taking 4 turns each, which has it roughly equal to the 9100F and 1600AF stock CPUs. The 9100F and 3100 are functionally equivalent. The 1600AF runs at 6.2 minutes, just ahead of the 3100 with thanks to additional threads, and the i3-9100F is still generally inadvisable for this type of workload given its thread and frequency deficit. In the Time Spy benchmark, things shift a bit in Intel's favor, with the Core i3-3100 posting higher Overall, Graphics, and CPU scores than the Ryzen 3 3100, at stock settings. That's a trend that will repeat itself through the rest of the tests. The 1600AF outdoes both in average framerate and is within run-to-run variance of the 9100F.
Benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 can be found below. Yeah, that's a $99 Ryzen 3 3100 beating the Core i7-7700K in this benchmark, if only by a minor amount. As for the 3600 reference point, that’s at about 140FPS AVG stock, so slightly higher percentage scaling to the 7700K stock.The first is the GN Monkey Head render. In the face of AMD’s under-the-radar 2600 re-fresh as a numerically reduced part, the 3100 looks disappointing, but it’s still objectively a good performer at the price point – just not as good. Adobe Premiere is next. The 9100F outperforms the 3100 in both framerate and frametime consistency, at 97FPS AVG, a measurable but imperceptible increase of 5%.
The 3100 OC allows us to closer approach the 1600AF OC result, although it required a much higher frequency than the 1600AF.Red Dead Redemption 2 is next, starting with 1080p and Vulkan. In the synthetic world of the Fire Strike benchmark, the Ryzen 5 3600 and 1600AF's extra cores and threads come into play as the workload exploits their enhanced parallelism. The 7700K leads at 138FPS AVG, a 21% jaunt over the 3100, with an overclock pushing it to 148FPS AVG. We expect competition to be even more heated for the mid-range when Comet Lake launches. The Core i7-7700K's four cores and eight threads assert themselves in this title after overclocking, but once again the Ryzen 3 3300X takes the lead over it and the Core i5-9400F in the stock configurations. If you use a worse cooler, Precision Boost 2 will bring down clocks accordingly.Our next frequency chart is Blender with an all-core, all-thread workload. Other threads, like Core 2, Thread 0 will come in occasionally and at similar clocks.