In some cases the British designated a person to act as "chief" in settings where there was no clearly hierarchical structure in place. Native institutions were utilized and interference with local customs kept to a minimum, although the British did not always understand the local… Thanks.This is great but could u put the conclusion next timeI like the the reasons because it is usefulOOH THX FOR SAVING ME IN HISTORY CLASS cameroon gce ordinary level June 2019 computer science 3 Cameroon gce o level march 2020 west regional mock additional mathematics 1 Cameroon gce o level march 2020 north west regional mock mathematics 2 Cameroon gce o level march 2020 west regional mock mathematics 2 Cameroon gce o level march 2020 west regional mock additional mathematics 2 Cameroon gce o level march 2020 wouri common mock additional mathematics 1 Cameroon gce o level march 2020 littoral regional mock additional mathematics 2 Cameroon gce o level march 2020 north west regional mock additional mathematics 1 Finally, Indirect Rule succeeded in Northern Nigeria due to the fact that the practice of the Indirect Rule system was economical for the British government. Indirect rule was the plan to use existing tribal structures and traditions as conduits for establishing rules and regulations while English officials worked behind the scenes and could exercise a veto power.
It does not matter who you are, where you live or what you’re doing at the moment. But in the late 19th century the European countries negotiated a partition of African territory among themselves (without Africans present) at a conference in Berlin in late 1884-early 1885. This was because comparatively, little money was expended. In other words, the indirect rule is a system of administration in which the British colonial government made use of the paramount chiefs to govern the people of its colonies in accordance with their traditional political system, under the guidance and supervision of officials of the British government.
Most of the Europeans were afraid of contracting tropical diseases such as malaria. Would you prefer taking an online course in the comfort of your home? The African chiefs would work at little or no pay at all. Thank you so muchI'm much greatful of your source, congratulation.This actually awesome, thanks so muchGive Reasons for British to use indirect rule in East Africa.the materials are good thanks alotI like the answers to the question why the indirect rule was introduced. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. British indirect rule system, is an indirect colonial system of governance, using traditional monarchy and emirs to rule as a british proxy in ruling a regions that specialized in cultural system of government before the coming of british colonialism in northern nigeria. In a system of indirect rule, the British would send only a relatively few English people to supervise India. To reduce the administrative costs of the colony because it was vast / costs.
Why did the British use indirect rule to administer Northern Nigeria? There existed an already acceptable system of administrating through the Emirs and Qadis. Consider the differences in power between the two groups.
India's princely states, where from the mid-eighteenth century the British first employed and developed this system of indirect rule, stood as the conscious model for later imperial administrators and politicians who wished to extend the Empire without the economic and political costs of … So why did the British adopt the Indirect Rule system in administering their West African colonies during the colonial period?Well, you will now know the reasons why Britain introduced Indirect Rule to British West Africa.But I think it is proper for us to get a clear meaning of the term “Indirect Rule” first.From the 1920s onwards, the British adopted a system of administration known as Indirect Rule to administer their territories in British West Africa.Under this system, the traditional rulers (chiefs) were the main instruments by which the British executed their polices.Where there were no chiefs with traditional authority, the British appointed so-called “warrant chiefs” to constitute traditional authorities. Agreements in hand, the countries proceeded to make good on their claims essentially to move up the rivers, trade routes and trade networks to create a greater European presence while eliminating many local African economic arrangements.But what should you do once you asserted your claim to territory?
By engaging in indirect rule, it did not have to do this.
It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
The colonies were large and recruiting British officials at all levels would be costly.