Google is both behind the times and ahead of them. Even with all the massive hype Google applied to Glass – like the try at exclusive Glass distribution ‘stores’ such as the floating mega-barge they were building in the Bay – they couldn’t make this turd of a product marketable.ugh, another scientifically illiterate idiot regurgitating this “green” nonsense.“Not everyone was comfortable with the idea of having a gadget that constantly emits carcinogenic radiation so close to the head. This was thanks to the unclear advantages of using the product and all the other negatives (low battery life, unappealing design, etc. The two to three-hour battery life enabled users to check messages, view photos, and search the Internet. Google Glass Wasn't a Failure. IThe worst part was the fact that some tech geeks and journalists are very opinionated people, and they do have the habit of sharing their experiences through multiple channels including social media and personal blogs.Obtaining the Google Glass offered no clear benefit to consumers whatsoever. The mounted camera isn’t really a bad idea, but it could be in the wrong hands and situation.Ultimately, the failure of the Google Glass was a result of bad marketing. Before the product was even launched, there were already concerns as to how safe Google... Aesthetically Unappealing. Glass was competing with other devices that boasted superior cameras, larger capacity, and faster processors.Glass is not meant for mass consumption—not at this moment. While Google Glass utterly failed as a consumer device, its second life as an industrial tool makes a lot of sense. The "official" word is out: Google has announced that it will stop selling its Google Glass smartglasses and that Google X, the company's research group, … Google Glass wasn’t coming to save the world, just help it. Instead, it was exclusively sold to “Glass Explorers” who had to pay $1,500 to be called “early adopters”. I enjoyed the article …While the idea of a smart device mounted on a pair of glasses sounded awesome, Google Glass’ design somehow looked awkward and very unattractive. I got it for free through a developer program back in 2013 and while yes, it does have it’s faults; which are still overshadowed by the fact that it wasn’t a finished product, I can definitely say that Glass is an amazing product with much future potential.Consequently, the underwhelming experience Tim and others received from the product damaged its reputation prematurely.To make it worse, the product sometimes stops working during important system events such as a firmware update. Anyways, there’s a new Glass code named Aura which will probably be announced in May at Google I/O, we’ll see if that a another “Miserable Failure” as you call it.It will be impossible to overcome the real and perceived privacy issues.
And although navigating the menus would feel responsive at times, the occasional jumpiness and sluggishness of apps and menus can be very frustrating.